Church is good and important for spiritual growth and fulfilling the mission of the body of Christ. But drifting far from what Jesus did and taught is what makes church utterly useless, no matter if it's "growing" and "advancing" the Gospel, no matter if it's mega, moneyed and increasing in membership. These are all garbage if church doesn't look like Jesus' ministry.
Give Up Everything
I think it all starts here. Jesus taught that, "Unless you give up everything you have, you cannot be my disciple." If you're not a disciple then all your ministries and all your efforts for God are nothing. Zero. Imagine telling Jesus, "Lord, I'm serving you but I'm not your disciple." And the number one prerequisite to being a disciple is giving up everything you have or own. This is never given emphasis in church.
Luke 14.33: You cannot become my disciple without giving up everything you own.
In my decades of being in church since I was among the young people, I have never heard anyone preach seriously about this. They teach about how discipleship is committing to a cell or discipleship group for regular bible studies and "accountability," being active in church, attending seminars, training and workshops on leadership, present in all the activities, and the like--none of which Jesus did or taught.
The radical nature of Jesus' teaching is precisely what makes it so easy for the modern church to soften, redefine, or simply ignore it. Jesus did not describe discipleship as adding church activities to an otherwise unchanged life. He described it as surrender and a radical transformation. He was not asking people to give him a portion of their lives while retaining ownership of everything else. He was calling them to recognize that nothing could remain more important than obedience to Him—not possessions, money, reputation, career, comfort, family expectations, or even one's plans for the future.
This is why the early church looked so radically different. Believers had their possessions in common, and sold their goods to meet the needs of others. "There was not a needy person among them," says Acts 4. This was not merely a fundraising strategy or a special offering campaign. It was the practical evidence that they had stopped treating their possessions as exclusively their own. Their encounter with Christ had changed their relationship with material things. They really gave up everything they had.
No preacher today exhorts on this.
Jesus had already made this principle unmistakable. "Sell what you have and give to the poor," he told not just the rich young ruler (Matthew 19:21) but his disciples as well (Luke 12.33), and to give to everyone who asks and not to turn away from one who wants to borrow (Matthew 5:42). I'll repeat that--give to everyone who asks (everyone), and not to turn away from those who borrow. It's entirely different today. They choose who to give help (not everyone) and lend only to those who can repay. And they teach that this is sound doctrine.
Luke 6.34: And if you lend to those from whom you expect repayment, what credit is that to you? Even sinners lend to sinners, expecting to be repaid in full.
He warned against storing treasures on earth (Matthew 6:19–21) and declared that no one can serve both God and money (Matthew 6:24).
Make Disciples
So perhaps the uncomfortable question is not whether our churches are growing, but whether we are actually making disciples. Are we producing people who surrender everything to Jesus, or people who have simply learned how to participate in religious activities? A church can have magnificent buildings, sophisticated programs, thousands of members, powerful preaching, and an impressive online presence—and still be profoundly unlike Jesus.
If Luke 14:33 is truly part of discipleship, then the church must be willing to obey it before demanding that ordinary believers obey it. The test is not how much we have accumulated for God, but how completely we are willing to surrender everything to him and use whatever remains under his Lordship for the good of others. That is the kind of discipleship that begins to make the church look like Jesus again.
Is the Church Even a Disciple?
And this is where things become painfully uncomfortable. If Jesus really meant what he said about giving up everything, then we cannot limit his teaching to individual Christians while exempting the institution itself. We cannot tell ordinary believers that discipleship means radical surrender while the church accumulates buildings, properties, vehicles, equipment, bank accounts, investments, and organizational assets that could otherwise be used to relieve human suffering. If everything belongs to Christ, then the question is not, "How much can the church acquire?" but, "What else has the church hasn't given up?"
Jesus never built an empire. He did not purchase property for a ministry headquarters. He did not accumulate wealth to finance an expanding religious organization. He had no impressive facility, no fleet of vehicles, no denominational structure, and no earthly institution to protect. He walked among the poor, fed the hungry, healed the sick, welcomed sinners, and commanded his followers to do likewise. When he encountered someone in need, he did not organize a seminar about compassion. He gave.
The early church followed this pattern. Their resources were directed toward people rather than institutional accumulation. "They sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need" (Acts 2:45). The question was not how to make the organization bigger, but how to make sure that nobody among them was left in need. I'd love to see a church like this today.
Imagine if churches today actually took this seriously. Imagine a congregation deciding that instead of acquiring another property, renovating another sanctuary, buying more expensive equipment, or building another administrative complex, they'd sell what they could and distribute the proceeds to the poor, widows, struggling families, persecuted believers, and people who had nothing. Imagine churches competing—not for membership, buildings, prestige, and influence—but to see which congregation could relieve the most suffering.
That would look much more like Jesus.
Perhaps the greatest threat to genuine discipleship is not that churches have too little. It may be that we have learned to possess too much while convincing ourselves that everything we possess is "for the Gospel." But Jesus never said that accumulating religious resources was the Gospel. He said, "Sell what you have, and give to the poor" (Luke 18:22).
The church does not become more like Jesus by becoming more impressive. It becomes more like Jesus by becoming more sacrificial.
______________________________________
If you want to help us in our deep financial woes, please send donations to my wife's GCash: 0956-820-9092. Or my Paypal. Big thanks and GOD bless you.








